
The question on the minds of many fans and media types following the Grizzlies’ 106-105 loss Monday night to the Portland Trail Blazers had to do with how Travis Outlaw was able to drive from near half court to within six feet of the basket after receiving the ball with 2.8 seconds left?
A more pointed thought: Why didn’t the Griz (with a foul to give) elect to hack Outlaw after his first dribble and with so little time remaining?
Mike Miller, who defended Outlaw on the play, said Monday night that it was talked about during the time out. Head coach Marc Iavaroni shed more light on the sequence and his philosophy after Tuesday’s practice.
Iavaroni said he instructed the Grizzlies NOT to foul anyone on a drive to the basket. He doesn’t believe in that. So Miller did exactly what he was told to in that situation because Iavaroni didn’t want to risk a referee’s questionable call sending Outlaw to the free throw line.
Iavaroni noted that fouling on a drive to the basket and whether to consider “continuation” can be interpreted many ways by an official. He pointed out that Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant recently benefited from a generous call.
Sometimes all it takes is for a player to flail his arms and act as if he was shooting to con an official into awarding free throws. It’s something that actually happened in the Griz-Blazers game when a Portland player was clearly fouled before attempting a shot but was considered to be in the act of shooting.
So there’s the explanation. Now, why were the Griz even in that situation?
We don’t have enough time – not even in a blog. I, for one, am just happy that Iavaroni elected to bring Damon Stoudamire back in the game during crunch time. He makes better decisions and clutch shots no matter what’s happened during the first three quarters.
Responses to “Dec. 4: To foul or not to foul”
December 4th, 2007 at 6:45 pm
The Grizzlies should’ve foul on the inbounds play. Unfortunately Travis Outlaw got off a lucky shot. Not once, but twice in crucial moments of the game for the Blazers. Here’s the thing Ron. The problem with the Grizzlies this season has been around perimeter defense. Too many times premeter scorers like Manu Ginobili, Mike Dunleavy Jr., and Brandon Roy and others and burned the Grizzlies numerous of times around the perimeter this season right now. I know that Iavaroni is a new coach and as a new coach. You need some time to get your players adjusted to play your schemes on the hardwood. It isn’t 20 games into the season yet and there’s possibly ” something up behind the scenes” I never expect the Grizzlies to be playoff bound in the first place, but I expect them to make a case to where they are showing some signs they are at least heading up in the right direction. I’m sure you can read between the lines of what I’m thinking about the Grizzlies at this point. But for the time being. I really need to hold my thoughts in my head until sometime in January to see if the Grizzlies will eventually sink or swim.
December 5th, 2007 at 9:55 am
I have no problem with not fouling. I think if you foul you end up in the same situation of an opponent having to make a great shot over your defense. I know Iavaroni knows he does not have the defenders he wants but he still needs to establish his philosophy so in the future it will not be a question.
December 5th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Great post Ron. This was something that needed to be adressed following what many fans deemed a questionable coaching decision. Thanks for getting the full story out to us.

3 comment.